software - What is a "patent-granting" license? - Open Source …
Sep 27, 2023 · Thanks for contributing an answer to Open Source Stack Exchange! Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research! But avoid … Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers. Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
terminology - Open Source Stack Exchange
Jul 28, 2015 · access to the source code; commercial use; right to redistribute; right to change; All things free software does allow. Free software is defined by the four freedom it grants: Freedom 0: The freedom to run the program for any purpose. Freedom 1: The freedom to study how the program works, and change it to make it do what you wish.
License compatibility for proprietary software - Open Source Stack …
Nov 25, 2022 · Yes, you can do it, but it's hard to give an answer for all combinations; when you copy open source into your product, you have to consider each software license's requirements separately. I would recommend you first simplify your problem to the combination My Proprietary Software + Apache 2.0, and see how to satisfy the requirements of the ...
Software licensing - Pre 1970's - Open Source Stack Exchange
The PAF compiler was not free software, it was just sold with the computer (probably in source form, printed in books). I believe customers could buy IBM 370 mainframes with source code of PL/1. I had the privilege to type PAF programs on an old CAB500 computer at Palais de la Découverte in the mid 1970s (as a teenager).
Understanding the MIT license - Open Source Stack Exchange
Dec 21, 2022 · To answer this question reasonably, I think we need to consider the details of how you are distributing the software. For example, if you are shipping the software in a traditional way, in a box with CDs, DVDs, documentation, etc., then one way to include the MIT license text is to print it out and include it in the documentation.
What is the difference between FOSS and FLOSS? - Open Source …
FLOSS meant Free/Libre Open Source Software, whereas FOSS would mean Free and Open Source Software. This is less clear, as FOSS may not be interpreted with freedom. If you want to accept both, you should use FLOSS. For More Info: Free Software, Open Source, FOSS, FLOSS - same same but different. Source: FLOSS and FOSS
When re-implementing software, does analyzing the original …
Jan 6, 2025 · Some examples: NTFS is a proprietary filesystem in Microsoft Windows. SMB is a proprietary network file sharing protocol in Microsoft Windows. Open source Linux software were created for both of these, based on reverse-engineering. This does not infringe Microsoft's copyrights. Patents are another matter to check, of course.
Are the terms proprietary software and closed source software ...
Feb 26, 2021 · Whereas Open Source is clearly defined, there are many variants of proprietary software with some degree of openness. This includes software that is truly closed source because the software is never externally distributed (e.g. backoffice or SaaS software), or software binaries that are made available to users under a non-Open license. For some ...
philosophy - What are the philosophical differences between open …
Therefore, every piece of software that uses NOSA as its license is open source, but not free software. Summary. To sum it up, open source means that the users have the access to the source code, but free software means that the users are free to use the code in any way they want. If something is considered as a free software, you can also use ...
gpl - Understanding the commercial applications of AGPL3 - Open …
May 19, 2024 · I have a JavaScript library which I want to open source AND potentially make a business out of. I've seen lots of companies that provide open-source software use the AGPL3 license, but I have a few questions about the commercial applications.