America’s Supreme Court tackles a thorny voting-rights case
L ouisiana v Callais, a case the Supreme Court heard on March 24th, contains a political puzzle. Why is the solidly Republican state defending a congressional map that cost the party a seat in 2024—and will likely keep that seat in Democratic hands after the 2026 midterms, when the fight to control the House of Representatives could be very close?
Election experts say President Trump's executive order to require proof of citizenship to vote won't apply to Wisconsin's ...
Raw Story on MSN16h
'Illegal at many levels': Trump's new move restricts voting rights without proper approvalPresident Donald Trump has signed a new executive order that sidesteps congressional approval process, in order to attempt to ...
Selma Jubilee revelers annual trek across the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Alabama reminds us why we can never stop advocating for ...
The case tests the balancing act states must strike in protecting the voting power of a racial minority while not ...
WCJB TV20 on MSN3h
Hundreds advocate for voting rights at Florida capitol WednesdayMore than a hundred people rallied outside the Florida Capitol Wednesday, urging lawmakers to take up the Florida Voting ...
Secretary of State Tobias Read and Attorney General Dan Rayfield suggest the state will defend its voting system.
1don MSN
New Hampshire has tested out its new law requiring people to show proof of citizenship before registering to vote.
Seeing federal courts slash away at the Voting Rights Act, some states are seeking to resurrect fallen protections for ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback